Nigeria To Begin Implementation Of New Company Law January, 2021

President Muhamdu Buhari

Nigeria’s laws for companies will entirely change from 2021, following the Gazette-ing of the Companies and Allied Matters Act, 2020, which was signed into law on 7th August, 2020 by President Muhammadu Buhari, more than 30 years after the old one. The announcement was made by the country’s Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) in charge of managing the affairs of companies in Nigeria via its Twitter handle. 

President Muhamdu Buhari
President Muhamdu Buhari

Here Is What Your Startup Needs To Know About The New Law

One Person Can Now Form A Company In Nigeria

Under the new law, although public companies are still required to have at least two members, a person can now form a private company. However, even though this is encouraged, the long-term prospects of the startup company should be considered, given that most startups are built for exit through IPOs or acquisitions etc., which makes a one-shareholder structure highly unsuitable for them in practice.

A Private Company May Now Transfer Its Shares

Unlike the old law where share transfer in a private company was restricted, this is not the case with with new law which gives all private companies in Nigeria the option to choose whether or not to transfer its shares in their articles of association. The implication of this is that in private companies, a structure in which most startups exist, shares can now be bought or sold at will. However, the company must obtain the consent of all its members before it sells more than 50% of the assets of the company. A shareholder in a private company is not also permitted to sell more than 50% of his shares to a non-shareholder unless he first offers to existing shareholders the shares meant for sale. He may then proceed to sell to a non-shareholder if the existing shareholders refuse. In the same way, that non-member willing to purchase the shares offered to him must also be ready to buy other shareholders’ interests in the shares offered.

Read also:Plentywaka Expands Business to Abuja With $300k Pre-Seed Funding

No More Need For A Company Secretary

Under the new law, every public or private company still needs to have a secretary. The requirement of a company secretary is only exempted for private companies which are small companies.

Annual General Meetings No Longer Compulsory For Small Companies Or Single Shareholder Companies

By virtue of the provisions of the law, small companies will no longer be mandatorily required to hold Annual General Meetings.

Under the law, a company qualifies as a small company in a year if for that year the following conditions are satisfied — 

  • It is a private company;
  • The amount of its turnover for that year is not more than ₦120 million or such amount as may be fixed by the Commission;
  • Its net assets value is not more than ₦60 million or such amount as may be fixed by the Commission;
  • None of its members is an alien (a foreigner)
  • None of its members is a Government or a Government corporation or agency or its nominee; and
  • The directors hold between themselves at least 51 per cent of its equity share capital.

Small Companies Exempted from Audit Requirement

Under the new law, a company (excluding banks and insurance companies) is exempt from the requirements relating to the audit of accounts in respect of a financial year if-

  • (a) it has not carried on any business since its incorporation ; or
  • (b) its turnover in that year is not more than ₦120 million and the balance sheet total is not more than ₦60 million. In other words, the company is a smalll company.

One Person Can Now Be A Director In A Small Company

The new law also made provisions concerning directors of a company. According to it, the minimum number of directors for every company (whether public or private) shall be two directors. However, in the case of a private company which is a small company, the minimum number of a director shall be one, unless otherwise provided by the company’s articles or any applicable industry specific legislation.

Other notable provisions include that a director of a public company shall not hold position of both the CEO and the Chairman at the same time. Again, a person cannot be a director in more than 5 public companies at a time.

For the first ever, the new company law is properly defining who an independent director is. Consequently, there must be 3 independent directors in every public company, who must not be employees in the company and who have not made or received any payment in excess of N20m from the company. They must also not own more than 30% direct or indirect equity in another company transacting with (transaction sum should not be more than N20m) the company. They should also not own more than 30% direct or indirect equity in the company.

Nigeria company law Nigeria company law Nigeria company law Nigeria company law Nigeria company law

Read also: All Digital Marketplaces In Kenya To Pay 1.5% Digital Service Tax Starting From 2021

Meetings Can Now Be Held On The Internet

The new law is also revolutionary in that it gives wider options to places where the meetings of a company may be held. Accordingly, it states that although all statutory and general meetings of companies may be held in Nigeria, small companies or companies with a single shareholder may hold its meetings anywhere in the world. Again, a private company (and not public companies) may hold all its meetings on the internet provided that it has created room for that in its articles of association.

Electronic Communications And Ease of Doing Business

The new law now make it possible for business to be run more easily. For instance, every member can now have a right to attend any general meeting of of a private company (either physically or electronically) and to speak and vote on any resolution (physically or through electronic means) before the meeting. The certified true copies of all such electronically filed documents are now admissible in evidence.

Struggling Companies In Distress Can Now Be Rescued From Total Collapse

Under the new law, the directors of the company may voluntarily arrange with those the company is owing for a way of satisfying all outstanding debts owed by the company.

No More Common Seal For Companies

The law has also put an end to the requirement for each company to have a common seal. In its place, it states that should any document be required by any law or otherwise to be under the common seal of the company, it is enough if the documents were signed by a director and a secretary; or by at least two directors of the company; or by a director in the presence of a witness who shall attest the signature.

Better Legal Framework For A VC Fund

Under Nigeria’s newly passed Companies and Allied Matters Act (‘The CAM Act’), it has also become easier to set up a legal structure for a VC fund. By the terms of the new law, venture capital firms in Nigeria may now be set up as limited liability partnership or limited partnership.

Previously, before the law came into being, it was normal practice to register VC firms as limited liability companies; general or limited partnerships, or as limited liability partnerships under the Partnership Law of Lagos State (Nigeria’s major economic city).

Even though under the old regime, general and limited partnerships could be registered and applied throughout Nigeria whereas limited liability partnerships only applied in Lagos, the new regime spells out definite governance framework for partnerships generally, as well as enlarges the operational scope of partnerships to cover the whole of Nigeria, and not just Lagos alone.

The essential difference between a limited liability partnership and a limited partnership under the new law is that while a limited liability partnership is a corporate body which has a legal personality different from the partnership as well as a perpetual succession, a limited partnership has no separate identity from those of the partners that make it up.

Indeed, a limited partnership under the new law captures the ideal form of most VC funds, which usually have one or more partners called general partners — responsible for the management of the funds under the partnership, and who are also liable for the debts and obligations of the partnership — as well as one or more persons known as limited partners — who contribute certain sums of money or property to the partnership and who shall not be liable to the debts and obligations of the partnership.

Apart from properly providing a clear legal framework for the operation of VC funds in Nigeria, the new partnership regime, under the CAM Act, also functions to provide some clarity about their taxation. To read more on this, click here

Bottom Line:

Remarkable, especially with the introduction of new provisions that have taken care of the difficulties necessitated by the coronavirus pandemic. However, apart from these, in practice, the law remains substantially the same with the old version. While certain provisions may look attractive given their cost-saving implications, there are several provisions which are unsuitable for companies with long-term vision.

For more on the new law and how it may affect your startup company, click here. (PDF)

Charles Rapulu Udoh

Charles Rapulu Udoh is a Lagos-based lawyer who has advised startups across Africa on issues such as startup funding (Venture Capital, Debt financing, private equity, angel investing etc), taxation, strategies, etc. He also has special focus on the protection of business or brands’ intellectual property rights ( such as trademark, patent or design) across Africa and other foreign jurisdictions.
He is well versed on issues of ESG (sustainability), media and entertainment law, corporate finance and governance.
He is also an award-winning writer

The Poison Pill in CAMA 2020 for Not-for-Profits Organisations

By  Chido Nwakanma

There is significant verbiage but little illumination out there about the trending disputation concerning the provisions of the 2020 Companies and Allied Matters Act on not-for-profits.  The petulant intervention of Bishop David Oyedepo of Living Faith Church brought anger rather than light and has inflamed the discourse. The consequence is that it has engaged combatants on either side of the Church versus the State debate rather than reasoned discussion to finetune or discard the legislation. 

Chido Nwakanma, Lagos Business School.
Chido Nwakanma, Lagos Business School.


Section 839 Chapter 4 of CAMA 2020 borrows part of what exists in other jurisdictions to spell out stipulations for the management of civil society organisations. It grants powers without responsibility. The decision of the Charities Commission in England to penalise the Mountain of Fire and Miracles Ministries therein has suddenly become a justification for the inelegant Nigerian legislation. It is enough to state that while apples and oranges have the same shape and classification as fruits, they differ, nonetheless. 

Read also:What Really Happened to Majek Fashek – By Moji Danisa


There is a loud hallelujah chorus for CAMA 2020. I share those sentiments in many areas. According to Banwo & Ighodalo Legal Practice, “CAMA 2020 is undeniably a progressive development in the Nigerian business and economic landscape and a big boost to the Ease-of-Doing-Business (EoDB) campaign of the Government. CAMA 2020 provides a robust framework for reforming identified onerous legal, regulatory and administrative bottlenecks which, for three decades, have made doing business in Nigeria substantially difficult (particularly for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs)), and impeded investments into Nigeria.”
That ululation does not apply to Chapter Four of Section 839. First, we must pivot from the reductionist position that sees the section only in terms of the Church. Or the non-argument that secular authorities cannot regulate churches. Jesus Christ instituted the Church standard, “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s” (Mark 12:17).
Section 839 covers the incorporated trustees of various nonprofits. These are associations “for the advancement of any religious, educational, literary, scientific, social, development, cultural, sporting or charitable purpose.” S839 of CAMA 2020 applies to the operations and activities of private secondary schools and universities, cultural associations, sports clubs, or the Umuode Development Association of my community. It also applies to various NGOs and other CSOs. 

Read also:Nigerian University Allocates Startup Funds To Graduating Students


It would help to read Section 443-558 on the appointment of administrators for companies in distress alongside a reading of Section 839. Subsection 1 of 839 empowers the CAC to apply to the court, suspend the trustees of an association and replace them with an interim manager(s). Reason? “If It reasonably believes” that there has been misconduct or mismanagement, fraud, to protect the property of the association or in the public interest. 
Compare this with S571 on winding up of a company. It would only happen if  “(a) the company has by special resolution resolved that the company be wound up by the Court; (b) default is made in delivering the statutory report to the Commission or in holding the statutory meeting; (c) the number of members is reduced below two in the case of companies with more than one shareholder; (d) the company is unable to pay its debts; (e) the condition precedent to the operation of the company has ceased to exist, or (f) the Court is of the opinion that it is just and equitable that the company should be wound up.”
Did you notice the difference? CAMA 2020 states clear grounds for winding up of a company starting with the intent of the promoters through to compliance failures or indebtedness. Contrarily, the provisions for CSOs are ambiguous and include notably “if it (CAC) reasonably believes” that there has been fraud, misconduct, or mismanagement. In other words, if CAC suspects an organisation, it applies to the court to remove its trustees and take over its affairs. Just like that! 
Moreover, there is no time limit to the running of affairs by the CAC-appointed and court-sanctioned managers.  Then there is the nebulous “public interest” provision. What is that? What does public interest mean here, and who defines it? 
Suspicion of the motive and intent of Section 839 stems from the nebulous grounds for the intervention of the CAC in the running of CSOs. The provisions are subject to varying interpretation. It comes against the backdrop of the poisoned chalice of mistrust that characterises Nigerian public affairs and governance in the Buhari Years.  Only the paranoid survive, Andy Grove famously asserted concerning competition in the microchips market. Paranoia is excusable in Nigeria today. 
S839 of CAMA 2020 sets a higher bar for CSOs than for even quoted companies. It is a bar that is, at times, invisible and other times unclear. If there is fraud or mismanagement in a company, the trustees would ordinarily involve the law such as invite the police, go to the court or seek arbitration. How is it the business of the CAC? 
It becomes the business of CAC in the case of CSOs. That brings up the issue of public benefit and the story of the fine on MFM in the UK. The Charity Commission for England and Wales regulates charities in that jurisdiction. Charities are public benefit organisations run by their trustees for the benefit of the charity’s beneficiaries. “An organisation cannot be a charity if it is run in the interests of anyone beyond the charity, including private individuals and public bodies such as local authorities”. 
The Charities Commission registers all charities. They enjoy grants-in-aid based on their registration. The charity law binds all charities, including those currently exempted from registration. They have an overriding duty to “act prudently and within the law” as in sound corporate governance. The Government intervenes based on the law and because it provides support and a cover for the charities to raise funds.There are various regulators. For instance, the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) regulates universities as charities. 
CAMA 2020 empowers CAC without giving it any responsibilities. CAC will do nothing for not-for-profits in the country but would have the power to take over their operations by appointing a manager to run their affairs on patently nebulous grounds. 
In an example of lazy legislative drafting, CAMA 2020 borrows aspects of the law from other jurisdictions but fails to go the whole hog. There is no Charities Commission, or will the CAC set up one? S 17 demands plaintiffs to inform CAC in writing 30 days before filing a suit against it. Strange. Then in S19, it disallows freedom of association or action by 20 or more persons running a business unless they register it with CAC. 
“No association, or partnership consisting of more than 20 persons shall be formed for the purpose of carrying on any business for profit or gain by the association, or partnership, or by the individual members thereof, unless it is registered as a company under this Act, or is formed in pursuance of some other enactments in force in Nigeria.”

Read also:23 Nigerian Startups, Innovators Win $258k From Nigeria’s Lagos State Government


CAMA 1990 listed lawyers, accountants, and company secretaries as those who can handle company registration. CAMA 2020 regresses from professions to individuals. S 705 of CAMA 2020 brings in a private body, BRIPAN, and vests it with the sole right for the practice of insolvency in Nigeria.
S 839 is just one of many poisonous provisions in the new CAMA that necessitate a re-think of the entire law. It speaks to deleterious sloppiness or malice aforethought. Was there stakeholder engagement at all as should be the norm?  There is a need to review the law.

Chido Nwakanma is of the Lagos Business School.

Kelechi Deca

Kelechi Deca has over two decades of media experience, he has traveled to over 77 countries reporting on multilateral development institutions, international business, trade, travels, culture, and diplomacy. He is also a petrol head with in-depth knowledge of automobiles and the auto industry